Tag Archives: post-concussion syndrome Alt Right

LIONEL PODCAST: The Hillary Clinton Criminal Conspiracy and Lie Machine

As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: you liberate a city by destroying it. Words are to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests. (Gore Vidal)

Meanwhile the planet crumbles.  And what are we not discussing? What are the mainstream sock puppet media ignoring altogether? How are deceived? Let me count the ways.

  • Hillary Clinton’s seemingly endless and interminable tapestry and mosaic of lies.
  • Hillary Clinton’s grave illness(es).
  • Hillary Clinton’s neurological maladies and in extremis.
  • Hillary Clinton’s unsuitability to serve as POTUS due to said illnesses.
  • Hillary Clinton’s criminal organized aka Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).
  • Hillary Clinton’s role in Laureate.
  • Hillary Clinton’s obfuscation as to her role and complicity in the Benghazi horror.
  • Hillary Clinton’s record as Wall Street shill, puppet and warmonger of the first stripe.
  • Hillary Clinton’s pay for play allegations and supporting proof via doc drop.
  • Hillary Clinton’s contempt for Congress, justice and the FBI.
  • Hillary Clinton’s coverup of serial predation on the part of her co-defendant, WJC.

Shall I go on? It’s beyond someone hiding a bad health record. It’s far graver than that and far more consequential. It’s about a bona fide crime family that has redefined criminality and blatant, patient and obvious contempt of order and the rule of law.

So what seems to be the mainstream media’s concerns. And what are hey fixated on?

  • Donald Trump’s hair.
  • Donald Trump’s tax returns. (That show not net worth and assets.)
  • Donald Trump’s steaks.
  • Donald Trump’s water.
  • Donald Trump’s hats, ties and clothing.
  • Donald Trump’s university. (But not Laureate, see supra.)
  • Donald Trump’s Atlantic City bankruptcies (along with a host of hotel luminaries including the city itself).
  • Donald Trump’s wife.
  • Donald Trump’s wife’s speech.
  • Donald Trump’s immigration status.
  • Donald Trump’s prior careers.
  • Donald Trump’s daughter.
  • Donald Trump’s sons and old trophy hunting photos.
  • Donald Trump’s ______ (use your imagination).

LIONEL PODCAST: What Will It Take for the Media to Admit Hillary’s Gravely Ill?

“Can’t a girl have a sick day or two? Don’t get me started, because when it comes to overqualified women having to try a hundred times harder than under qualified men to get a break, or even a level playing field, well, we know that story.” CNN’s Christiane Amanpour

This is mendacity on human growth hormone. A profound contempt for clarity, transparency and leveling with the American citizen and potential voter. It’s simply mind-boggling. The enemy of limpid and bare truth. Beyond corrupt. Putrescence personified. America will learn a lesson this time.

Who is this woman attending to Hillary Clinton? And what’s she doing? She’s either exchanging a secret Illuminati handshake with the almost-dropped Hillary or it’s a neurological checklist procedure, impromptu and in the open for the crowdsourced citizen journos to catch and collect. And her minions and zombies maintain the mindlessly inane excuses of pneumonia, pollen count, heat prostration and, yes, dehydration. And with that frozen straight face. Simply fascinating. Cognitive dissonance as performance art.

Examine the patient’s hands. Look for intrinsic hand, thenar and hypothenar muscle wasting.

Test the patient’s grip by having the patient hold the examiner’s fingers in their fist tightly and instructing them not to let go while the examiner attempts to remove them. Normally the examiner cannot remove their fingers. This tests the forearm flexors and the intrinsic hand muscles. Compare the hands for strength asymmetry. — The Precise Neurological Exam [e.s.]

Dehydration? Pollen? Overheating? Bullshit. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser M.D. joined my great friend, the Torquemada of the conservative rhythm section, Steve Malzberg on Newsmax TV to discuss Hillary Clinton’s health concerns. Dr. Jasser was a physician for the Navy and and physician for Congress and told Steve Hillary’s medical emergency was not caused by dehydration. I think he knows a thing or two anent and about.

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser: What she had was a syncopal episode. She passed out. That’s either cardiovascular or neurologic. Now, her team wants us to believe it is dehydration. She didn’t appear to be dehydrated and that doesn’t get fixed in 90 minutes. So I can tell you that it really appears and if I let a patient with the condition of syncope leave my office, and not get admitted, and get evaluated immediately, that would be malpractice. So there’s something going on.

“Threw a shoe and took a bad fall.” (Stephen Stills)

LIONEL PODCAST: What Really Happened on 9/11 and Why It’s Still a Secret

Look carefully. Three beams. Three beacons. Three? Yes, three. Why?

I am not a truther. (And as Gore Vidal noted famously) nor am I a conspiracy theorist; I’m a conspiracy analyst. The official story of 9/11 is folklorish and mythological. It’s beyond unbelievable and is, like Napoleon’s definition of history, a set of lies that people have agreed upon. If you’ve never spent any time deconstructing the amazing rewriting of the physical evidence, eyewitness testimony, the laws of gravity, physics, structural engineering, architectural science, piloting, aerodynamics, evidence, common sense — well, you’ve missed one of life’s rare events.

But there’s no evidence of it being a US government “inside job” or false flag or state-sponsored. There. Feel relieved? I know that’s what bothers many Americans, especially those in the Ted Baxter sockpuppet media. I mean, when has the government ever lied about its knowledge or complicity? Heavens! Now, that’s not to say it’s not a possibility or unlikely or even far-fetched. No, certainly not. There’s simply no evidence of it. Nor is there evidence of motivation, goal or intended results or beneficiaries. Cui bono? Cui prodest? I think we know, certainly. But that’s not evidence of anything. Notwithstanding a mountain of fascinating facts and data that scream out for further investigation and review. Think a permanent Russell-Sartre Tribunal of sorts. Anything but the dog and pony show of Congress. And on a personal, individual level, and from having spent my life investigating reality versus “history” I do not believe that President Cheney or his manservant Dubya knew anything in advance or were involved directly in any aspects of our day of horror. Aside from the lack of evidence indicating such, there’s the benefit of plausible deniability and the absolute folly that would involve their involvement. While I believe also that Pearl Harbor was not as recorded or believed, I do not believe FDR was directly involved or had knowledge beforehand. Know when to be detective; know when to be juror. Suspicion versus the weighing of probity. Just because you have an Aha! moment in determining that a piece of evidence as advanced is not what you believe to be true, culpability is not assigned thereafter. Dig?

The 9/11 Omission (ahem) was a bad joke. ‘Twas an enfeebled and reckless attempt to rush through what appeared to be an investigation (à law the Warren Commission of note) and even the commissioners found it, to put it mildly, problematic. the following is a marvelous compendium from WashingtonsBlog that I commend to you as it’s replete with citation and reference. Go ahead. Give it a look over.

The 9/11 Commission Didn’t Believe the Government … So Why Should We?

The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into a real 9/11 investigation:

  • The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”
  • The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”
  • No wonder the Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 – Bob Graham – and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a “PERMANENT 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.

Some examples of obstruction of justice into the 9/11 investigation include:

  • An FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House. As the New York Times notes:

Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence ….The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers.

  • The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government “minders” obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses (and see this)
  • The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements
  • As reported by ACLUFireDogLakeRawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001

Both the 9/11 Commission Investigation and 9/11 Trials Were Based on Unreliable Evidence Produced by Torture

The CIA videotaped the interrogation of 9/11 suspects, falsely told the 9/11 Commission that there were no videotapes or other records of the interrogations, and then illegally destroyed all of the tapes and transcripts of the interrogations.

9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:

Those who knew about those videotapes — and did not tell us about them — obstructed our investigation.

The chief lawyer for Guantanamo litigation – Vijay Padmanabhan – said that torture of 9/11 suspects was widespread.

And Susan J. Crawford – the senior Pentagon official overseeing the military commissions at Guantánamo told Bob Woodward:

We tortured Qahtani. His treatment met the legal definition of torture.

Indeed, some of the main sources of information were tortured right up to the point of death.

Moreover, the type of torture used by the U.S. on the Guantanamo suspects is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating false confessions. (and see thisthisthis and this).

And according to NBC News:

  • Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured
  • At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators information as a way to stop being “tortured”
  • One of the Commission’s main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ
  • The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to themselves

If the 9/11 Commissioners themselves doubt the information from the government, why should we believe it?

LIONEL PODCAST: The Distraction of the Republic in Realtime Real Fast


Let me see if I can clarify my political ideology. (See above.) I think this approximates my feelings anent and regarding the situation at hand. I’m not inclined to vote for Hillary. Or anyone. Save me. #LOUS4POTUS. The threat to our republic that Hillary Clinton poses exceeds and transcends anything that the mere and feeble human mind can possibly and adequately comprehend. She’s a Wall Street shill, a globalist puppet and a warmonger of the first stripe. Is Trump worse? Better, who cares? The lesser of two evils is still evil. And less. (As someone said, methinks.)

The show that deserves your immediate attention and then amnesia. It is hard to find one particular media sideshow that is by far the absolute worst when it comes to promoting and spewing disinformation, misinformation, ignorance as an artform and possessing a corrupt and putrid bias that in no wise even approximates the truth. A program “manned” by the least-informed and lest-equipped intellectually, factually and experientially. It’s difficult because the list of potential offenders is burgeoning. But hands down, the worst offender is by far and absolutely ABC’s The View. Congratulations. It’s simply breathtaking in its limited view and minimalist imagination with no early recognition of historicity and precedent.

The oaf’s oaf. “Hello, I’m Gary Johnson, a disheveled maundering dolt. A weed-addled, confused rodeo clown and distraction from my real sponsors: corporate fascists. My running mate’s a weathered sot and hack on the back nine of a dubious career. I lure disenchanted voters with the halcyon promise of ending weed penalties. And a few words about prostitution. I’ve really no plans to speak of and, frankly, just enjoy this vanity campaign. Look, I know it’s not about Aleppo. It’s about a bigger picture. It’s about how I, a loon who actually favors TPP, digs Hillary, advocates carbon taxes, refuses to acknowledge illegal aliens by insisting on “undocumented” whatevers, and who even believes bakeries should be forced to create gay, KK K, Nazi cakes – it’s about how I am fooling you loons by dangling that hoary and weathered Libertarian platform in front of you. I’m a façade. A Potemkin village. A cover. My kind goes back to Rockefeller, Lionel Robinson, LSE and a host of asset-stripping jackals and globalist thugs. Take that, suckas!”

Aleppo. Zeppo. Gone-o. Gary Johnson is a buffoon. A Boeotian. A rodeo clown and cover. A chuff and agrestic Boeotian. He’s there to strip votes from Trump or perhaps Hillary. He’s a Libertarian, a one-size-fits-all monumentally and breathtakingly vague standard bearer of a Potemkin village cover for corporate fascism. But if you’ve listened to me, you already knew that. Mike Barnicle, remember him? You should.

Asked what he would do about the Syrian city of Aleppo, the region at the center of that nation’s civil war and refugee crisis, Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson responded by asking, “what is Aleppo?”

“What would you do if you were elected about Aleppo?” MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” panelist Mike Barnicle asked the former New Mexico governor during an in-studio interview Thursday morning.

“And what is Aleppo?” Johnson responded.

“You’re kidding,” a stunned Barnicle replied, to which Johnson answered that he was not.

Barnicle explained to the Libertarian candidate that Aleppo is “the epicenter of the refugee crisis” in Syria, giving Johnson enough information to finally answer the question.

“Okay, Got it. Well, with regard to Syria, I do think that it’s a mess,” he said. “I think the only way that we deal with Syria is to join hands with Russia to diplomatically bring that at an end but when we’ve aligned ourselves with — when we have supported the opposition, the Free Syrian Army, the Free Syrian Army is also coupled with the Islamists, and then the fact that we’re also supporting the Kurds and this is, it’s just a mess. And this is the result of regime change that we end up supporting and, inevitably, these regime changes have led to a less safe world.”

Asked what he would do about the Syrian city of Aleppo, the region at the center of that nation’s civil war and refugee crisis, Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson responded by asking, “what is Aleppo?”

“What would you do if you were elected about Aleppo?” MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” panelist Mike Barnicle asked the former New Mexico governor during an in-studio interview Thursday morning.

“And what is Aleppo?” Johnson responded.

“You’re kidding,” a stunned Barnicle replied, to which Johnson answered that he was not.

Barnicle explained to the Libertarian candidate that Aleppo is “the epicenter of the refugee crisis” in Syria, giving Johnson enough information to finally answer the question.

“Okay, Got it. Well, with regard to Syria, I do think that it’s a mess,” he said. “I think the only way that we deal with Syria is to join hands with Russia to diplomatically bring that at an end but when we’ve aligned ourselves with — when we have supported the opposition, the Free Syrian Army, the Free Syrian Army is also coupled with the Islamists, and then the fact that we’re also supporting the Kurds and this is, it’s just a mess. And this is the result of regime change that we end up supporting and, inevitably, these regime changes have led to a less safe world.” [Source]